Understanding Sexual Arousal in Unexpected Circumstances

Chapter 1: The Concept of Arousal Nonconcordance

Have you ever found yourself in a situation—perhaps at work, during a family gathering, or on an unappealing date—where you felt unexpectedly sexually aroused? This phenomenon, known as Arousal-Nonconcordance, is quite normal. It refers to the disconnect between physiological responses, such as genital arousal, and the emotional or cognitive experiences that accompany them.

This paragraph will result in an indented block of text, typically used for quoting other text.

Section 1.1: Understanding Arousal-Nonconcordance

The common belief perpetuated by media and educational materials often suggests that “an erection means arousal.” However, this is not universally true. It’s crucial to distinguish between three dimensions:

Physiological (Body)
Cognitive (Mind)
Emotional (Feelings)

A genital erection is an automatic physiological reaction that does not necessarily indicate desire or enjoyment. Many individuals have encountered situations where they experienced genital arousal when it was unwelcome, or conversely, did not experience arousal in an expected sexual context. Both scenarios are completely normal.

So, what causes this phenomenon? A variety of factors can trigger or inhibit physiological reactions. For example, you might feel aroused during a pleasant intimate moment with a partner, or conversely, experience arousal in an uncomfortable situation, such as being approached inappropriately at a bar.

Even non-sexual stimuli, like sitting in a new car or feeling nervous, can provoke a genital response. Physical activities, such as exercising, can also lead to arousal through muscle contractions, increased blood flow, and oxygen circulation.

Let’s illustrate this with a hypothetical scenario:

Example: Sue and Jack's Experience

Sue and Jack met six months ago at a birthday celebration. While watching a movie together recently, Jack began kissing Sue’s neck. She felt relaxed and content, leading to a genital response that aligned with her emotional and cognitive approval: “Yes! I enjoy this; I want more.”

In this case, all signals matched: Erection + Liking + Wanting.

Now consider a contrasting scenario: Sue was on the subway when a man sat too close for her comfort. When she noticed him with his penis exposed, her immediate thoughts were “This is unacceptable!” Yet, her body responded with arousal. Here, she experienced: Erection, but no Liking or Wanting.

The key takeaway is that a genital response alone does not determine whether a person is enjoying or desiring the experience.

Section 1.2: The Importance of Recognizing Arousal Nonconcordance

Understanding Arousal-Nonconcordance is vital, especially in complex situations. For example, someone listening to a podcast about sexual assault may feel disgusted, shocked, and frustrated—yet also find themselves aroused, which can lead to confusion, shame, or self-loathing. An automatic physiological response does not equate to consent or desire.

Similarly, in movies, a scene may depict a couple preparing for intimacy but one partner does not achieve an erection. While this typically leads to drama on screen, in reality, it can cause uncertainty, even though it’s a normal occurrence.

The misinterpretation of bodily signals can lead to harmful narratives, such as the cliché “She said no, but her body said yes.” It’s crucial to understand that consent is clear: if someone says no, it must be respected.

Research indicates that women often experience arousal nonconcordance more frequently than men, though it can affect anyone. If you typically experience concordance, encountering nonconcordance can feel disorienting, but it’s a natural aspect of human physiology.

Chapter 2: Communicating Desires and Boundaries

To truly understand if someone is sexually aroused or interested, we must pay attention to their verbal and non-verbal cues rather than relying solely on physiological responses.

Instead of scrutinizing your partner excessively—an approach that can be off-putting—try to observe their comfort levels and reactions. Consider their mood, facial expressions, and body language when initiating physical contact.

Asking gentle questions like “Do you enjoy this?” or “Would you like to continue?” can provide clarity in ambiguous situations. Some individuals may struggle to articulate their desires, so fostering a supportive environment can help them feel secure in expressing their needs.

If you want to explore the topic of Arousal-Nonconcordance further, I highly recommend Dr. Emily Nagoski’s insightful book, Come As You Are, or her TED Talk titled The Truth About Unwanted Arousal.